Warning, regenerating HTTP session for security.


Warning: session_regenerate_id() [function.session-regenerate-id]: Cannot regenerate session id - headers already sent in /home/dewro/public_html/secure/functions.php on line 234
Fisher Woodcraft

Fisher Woodcraft Logo

DNA Testing

After turning a bowl from green (wet) wood, one must dry the bowl.  Usually this drying process is slowed by the application of waxes, sealants, or drying in a humid environment (like a paper bag).  This can take 3-6 months or more, depending on many factors.

There are dozens of different methods out there that allegedly speed up this process.  They range from kilns, to microwaving, boiling, soaking in soap, and soaking in Denatured Alcohol (or DNA for short).

Being of a scientific mind, I was suspicious of the science behind these methods.  I set out to test the DNA method here, and plan to test others in the future.

I will be comparing air drying with no sealer against the DNA soaking procedure found at David Smith's site, found at this link. 

I'm carrying out two tests.

A test comparing two bowls.

A test comparing two end-grain slabs.

BOWL TEST:

Weight Chart

Date Bowl Weight (oz) Weight Loss (oz) % Weight Loss Total Weight Loss (oz) Total % Weight Loss
26-Jun 1 DNA 25.875        
  2 AIR 21.125        
27-Jun 1 DNA 22.875 3.000 11.6% 3.000 11.6%
  2 AIR 20.500 0.625 3.0% 0.625 3.0%
28-Jun 1 DNA 21.875 1.000 4.4% 4.000 15.5%
  2 AIR 20.125 0.375 1.8% 1.000 4.7%
29-Jun 1 DNA 21.500 0.375 1.7% 4.375 16.9%
  2 AIR 19.875 0.250 1.2% 1.250 5.9%
30-Jun 1 DNA          
  2 AIR          
1-Jul 1 DNA          
  2 AIR          
2-Jul 1 DNA 20.875 0.625 2.9% 5.000 19.3%
  2 AIR 19.500 0.375 1.9% 1.625 7.7%
3-Jul 1 DNA          
  2 AIR          
4-Jul 1 DNA 20.500 0.375 1.8% 5.375 20.8%
  2 AIR 19.125 0.375 1.9% 2.000 9.5%
5-Jul 1 DNA 20.375 0.125 0.6% 5.500 21.3%
  2 AIR 18.875 0.250 1.3% 2.250 10.7%
6-Jul 1 DNA          
  2 AIR          
7-Jul 1 DNA 20.250 0.125 0.6% 5.625 21.7%
  2 AIR 18.625 0.250 1.3% 2.500 11.8%
8-Jul 1 DNA 20.125 0.125 0.6% 5.750 22.2%
  2 AIR 18.500 0.125 0.7% 2.625 12.4%
9-Jul 1 DNA 20.000 0.125 0.6% 5.875 22.7%
  2 AIR 18.375 0.125 0.7% 2.750 13.0%
10-Jul 1 DNA 19.875 0.125 0.6% 6.000 23.2%
  2 AIR 18.250 0.125 0.7% 2.875 13.6%
11-Jul 1 DNA 19.875 0.000 0.0% 6.000 23.2%
  2 AIR 18.250 0.000 0.0% 2.875 13.6%
12-Jul 1 DNA 19.625 0.250 1.3% 6.250 24.2%
  2 AIR 18.125 0.125 0.7% 3.000 14.2%
13-Jul 1 DNA 19.625 0.000 0.0% 6.250 24.2%
  2 AIR 18.125 0.000 0.0% 3.000 14.2%
14-Jul 1 DNA 19.500 0.125 0.6% 6.375 24.6%
  2 AIR 18.125 0.000 0.0% 3.000 14.2%

After removing paper:

Date Bowl Weight (oz) Weight Loss (oz) % Weight Loss Total Weight Loss (oz) Total % Weight Loss
26-Jun 1 DNA 22.75        
  2 AIR 20.25        
14-Jul 1 DNA 19.000 3.750 16.5% 3.750 16.5%
  2 AIR 17.500 2.750 13.6% 2.750 13.6%

I wanted the two bowls to be as similar as possible, so I turned them from two halves of the same log.  They are both 7.5" in diameter, and about 4" tall.  The walls were turned to about 3/4" thickness.  They were checked for similarity with a caliper.

The bowls will be treated in the same manner, with the exception of the DNA soak.

06/25/2006

Both bowls were turned, then weighed.  Here are our test subjects:

Thumbnail

Note how scared they look.  Bowl 2 will be air dried, bowl 1 will be receiving the alcohol soak.

Bowl #1: 1 lb 6.75 oz

Bowl #2: 1 lb 4.25 oz

Hey, not bad!  So, marked and weighed, bowl 1 meets its fate in the DNA bath, weighed down with an old hammer head.

Thumbnail

Be brave, my little friend.  Be brave.  After seeing bowl 1 sleep with the fishes, bowl 2 retreated to a paper bag filled with its own shavings.  I thought this would be the fairest way for it to spend the first day of the test.

More tomorrow!

06/26/06

I pulled the bowl from the DNA and set it on a rack to dry.  In the meantime, I took the other bowl out of the damp shavings and wrapped the outside in a paper grocery bag, per the directions at Mr. Smith's site.

After almost an hour of drying, I wrapped the DNA bowl in the same paper.  Both bowls were weighed and put in my dehumidified basement to dry on a wire rack.

ThumbnailNote the extra wrapped thing on the left.  See the slab test for more info on that.

06/27/06

Like my new weight chart?  It appears that the DNA bowl has lost a much larger percentage of its weight the first day.  That may be attributable to the leftover DNA evaporating.  We'll see what future days bring!

07/02/06

Just back from a weekend trip.  The DNA bowl continues to lose moisture at a faster rate than the air dried bowl.  Very interesting.  Is could be that wood soaked up extra alcohol during the DNA bath, and is now giving it off.  Notice that the DNA bowl started out 2.5oz heavier, but was 4.65oz heavier after the DNA bath.  This doesn't necessarily mean the DNA process doesn't work, as the DNA could have displaced the water in the wood.  Since the DNA evaporates faster than water, it explains why it's losing weight at a faster rate.

07/14/06

The paper was removed from the blanks, and they were brought upstairs to dry in my living room.  There was similar distortion noted in both bowls, and no new checks in either bowl were noted at the piths.

Thumbnail Thumbnail

SLAB TEST:

Weight Chart:

Date Slab Weight (oz) Weight Loss (oz) % Weight Loss Total Weight Loss (oz) Total % Weight Loss
27-Jun 1 DNA 19.250        
  2 AIR 16.375        
  3 Water 20.625        
28-Jun 1 DNA 18.125 1.125 5.8% 1.125 5.8%
  2 AIR 16.125 0.250 1.5% 0.250 1.5%
  3 Water 20.125 0.500 2.4% 0.500 2.4%
29-Jun 1 DNA 17.750 0.375 2.1% 1.500 7.8%
  2 AIR 16.000 0.125 0.8% 0.375 2.3%
  3 Water 19.625 0.500 2.5% 1.000 4.8%
30-Jun 1 DNA          
  2 AIR          
  3 Water          
1-Jul 1 DNA          
  2 AIR          
  3 Water          
2-Jul 1 DNA 17.250 0.500 2.8% 2.000 10.4%
  2 AIR 15.875 0.125 0.8% 0.500 3.1%
  3 Water 18.875 0.750 3.8% 1.750 8.5%
3-Jul 1 DNA          
  2 AIR          
  3 Water          
4-Jul 1 DNA 16.875 0.375 2.2% 2.375 12.3%
  2 AIR 15.750 0.125 0.8% 0.625 3.8%
  3 Water 18.500 0.375 2.0% 2.125 10.3%
5-Jul 1 DNA 16.500 0.375 2.2% 2.750 14.3%
  2 AIR 15.375 0.375 2.4% 1.000 6.1%
  3 Water 18.125 0.375 2.0% 2.500 12.1%
6-Jul 1 DNA          
  2 AIR          
  3 Water          
7-Jul 1 DNA 16.250 0.250 1.5% 3.000 15.6%
  2 AIR 15.250 0.125 0.8% 1.125 6.9%
  3 Water 17.875 0.250 1.4% 2.750 13.3%
8-Jul 1 DNA 16.125 0.125 0.8% 3.125 16.2%
  2 AIR 15.125 0.125 0.8% 1.250 7.6%
  3 Water 17.625 0.250 1.4% 3.000 14.5%
9-Jul 1 DNA 16.000 0.125 0.8% 3.250 16.9%
  2 AIR 15.000 0.125 0.8% 1.375 8.4%
  3 Water 17.500 0.125 0.7% 3.125 15.2%
10-Jul 1 DNA 15.875 0.125 0.8% 3.375 17.5%
  2 AIR 14.875 0.125 0.8% 1.500 9.2%
  3 Water 17.375 0.125 0.7% 3.250 15.8%
11-Jul 1 DNA 15.875 0.000 0.0% 3.375 17.5%
  2 AIR 14.750 0.125 0.8% 1.625 9.9%
  3 Water 17.250 0.125 0.7% 3.375 16.4%
12-Jul 1 DNA 15.625 0.250 1.6% 3.625 18.8%
  2 AIR 14.625 0.125 0.8% 1.750 10.7%
  3 Water 17.000 0.250 1.4% 3.625 17.6%
13-Jul 1 DNA 15.625 0.000 0.0% 3.625 18.8%
  2 AIR 14.625 0.000 0.0% 1.750 10.7%
  3 Water 16.875 0.125 0.7% 3.750 18.2%
14-Jul 1 DNA 15.500 0.125 0.8% 3.750 19.5%
  2 AIR 14.375 0.250 1.7% 2.000 12.2%
  3 Water 16.625 0.250 1.5% 4.000 19.4%

After removing paper:
Date Slab Weight (oz) Weight Loss (oz) % Weight Loss Total Weight Loss (oz) Total % Weight Loss
27-Jun 1 DNA 19.250        
  2 AIR 16.375        
  3 Water 20.625        
14-Jul 1 DNA 14.875 4.375 22.7% 4.375 22.7%
  2 AIR 13.625 2.750 16.8% 2.750 16.8%
  3 Water 16.000 4.625 22.4% 4.625 22.4%

This test uses three slabs of wet hickory, which has been very prone to splitting.  The slabs were cut consecutively from the same log.  Care was taken to make sure none of the three slabs had any visible checks to begin with.

Slab #1: Will be soaked in DNA for 24 hours, then wrapped in paper.

Slab #2: Will be immediately wrapped in paper.

Slab #3: Will be soaked in water for 24 hours, then wrapped in paper.

06/26/06

The slabs were cut and put in their respective mediums.  Slab #1 went right in the DNA, slab #2 was wrapped with paper, slab #3 was dunked in a bucket of water.  Interestingly, the hickory sunk in the DNA but floated in the water.

Weights:

Slab #1: Still in DNA

Slab #2: 1lb 0 5/8oz

Slab #3: Still in water

07/02/06

Amusingly, the slab soaked in water lost more weight this time than the DNA slab.  It does correlate my hypothesis about extra weight absorbed during the soaking step for the DNA bowl.  Again, time will tell.

07/14/06

The paper was removed from the blanks, and they were brought upstairs to dry in my living room.  The DNA slab has 3 noticeable checks radiating from the pith.  The other two slabs have no noticeable checks.

Thumbnail Thumbnail Thumbnail

Sorry, but to prevent attacks by SPAM-bots, a Javascript-enabled browser is required to see my email address.

All content Copyright 2008 Joe Fisher
No content may be used without express written permission